<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avatar: Kwon &amp; Juan Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popten.net/2010/02/avatar-kwon-juan-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popten.net/2010/02/avatar-kwon-juan-review/</link>
	<description>top ten lists and pop culture rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 20:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://popten.net/2010/02/avatar-kwon-juan-review/comment-page-1/#comment-248404</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popten.net/?p=6844#comment-248404</guid>
		<description>I think differences in one&#039;s ability to empathize with the characters in Avatar versus Mr. Fox has less to do with their visual presentation than it does the characters themselves. The facial mapping in Avatar provided an unparalleled sense of humanity (or Smurf-cat-personity) for its characters, but what they were doing and saying was sadly unoriginal and often implausible.

Taken as an &quot;experience&quot;, I think Avatar was a lot of fun. It didn&#039;t redefine the sci-fi epic, it didn&#039;t raise the bar for writing in Hollywood blockbusters, and its characters certainly weren&#039;t all that memorable. 
 It did, however, have a lot of bright, engaging visuals (in outdoor shots, anyway) and exciting fight scenes filled with fantastic creatures and big, stompy robots. As long as one didn&#039;t go in actually expecting the cinematic Epiphany promised by the studio&#039;s marketing, I think Avatar held up just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think differences in one&#8217;s ability to empathize with the characters in Avatar versus Mr. Fox has less to do with their visual presentation than it does the characters themselves. The facial mapping in Avatar provided an unparalleled sense of humanity (or Smurf-cat-personity) for its characters, but what they were doing and saying was sadly unoriginal and often implausible.</p>
<p>Taken as an &#8220;experience&#8221;, I think Avatar was a lot of fun. It didn&#8217;t redefine the sci-fi epic, it didn&#8217;t raise the bar for writing in Hollywood blockbusters, and its characters certainly weren&#8217;t all that memorable.<br />
 It did, however, have a lot of bright, engaging visuals (in outdoor shots, anyway) and exciting fight scenes filled with fantastic creatures and big, stompy robots. As long as one didn&#8217;t go in actually expecting the cinematic Epiphany promised by the studio&#8217;s marketing, I think Avatar held up just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://popten.net/2010/02/avatar-kwon-juan-review/comment-page-1/#comment-293000</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popten.net/?p=6844#comment-293000</guid>
		<description>I think differences in one&#039;s ability to empathize with the characters in Avatar versus Mr. Fox has less to do with their visual presentation than it does the characters themselves. The facial mapping in Avatar provided an unparalleled sense of humanity (or Smurf-cat-personity) for its characters, but what they were doing and saying was sadly unoriginal and often implausible.

Taken as an &quot;experience&quot;, I think Avatar was a lot of fun. It didn&#039;t redefine the sci-fi epic, it didn&#039;t raise the bar for writing in Hollywood blockbusters, and its characters certainly weren&#039;t all that memorable. 
 It did, however, have a lot of bright, engaging visuals (in outdoor shots, anyway) and exciting fight scenes filled with fantastic creatures and big, stompy robots. As long as one didn&#039;t go in actually expecting the cinematic Epiphany promised by the studio&#039;s marketing, I think Avatar held up just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think differences in one&#8217;s ability to empathize with the characters in Avatar versus Mr. Fox has less to do with their visual presentation than it does the characters themselves. The facial mapping in Avatar provided an unparalleled sense of humanity (or Smurf-cat-personity) for its characters, but what they were doing and saying was sadly unoriginal and often implausible.</p>
<p>Taken as an &#8220;experience&#8221;, I think Avatar was a lot of fun. It didn&#8217;t redefine the sci-fi epic, it didn&#8217;t raise the bar for writing in Hollywood blockbusters, and its characters certainly weren&#8217;t all that memorable.<br />
 It did, however, have a lot of bright, engaging visuals (in outdoor shots, anyway) and exciting fight scenes filled with fantastic creatures and big, stompy robots. As long as one didn&#8217;t go in actually expecting the cinematic Epiphany promised by the studio&#8217;s marketing, I think Avatar held up just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

